
3
© SOLARHOT 2006-2009
If you want to know the exact impact of your tilt and direction on the performance of your system you
can go to www.retscreen.net and go through their solar calculator. They have weather data from every
weather station in North America, as well as a database of most solar collectors available today. You
simply enter the weather station that is most appropriate for your location, indicate the tilt of the collector as
well as the orientation (azimuth), and the software will spit out the overall energy produced. You compare
that with the perfect orientation and you can see what impact your siting decision has on the overall
output of the system. Feel free to play around with this database. It provides a wealth of information.
Don’t be discouraged if you can’t gure out all of the other inputs because they are not pertinent to the
question of what impact your siting has on the performance of your system.
Note: Later in the book we will discuss sizing of the collector area. The rules of thumb that we go over
are based on collectors being pointed south and angled to match the latitude of the site. If you need to
use an angle and pitch that signicantly reduces the solar gain of your collectors (as measured by the
Retscreen database), I recommend adding collector area to get back to the same quantity of energy
collected.
Issue #3—Shading: If you mount your collectors in a location where they are shaded during a portion
of the solar day or are shaded during a portion of the year, you will reduce the output of the system.
There are no exceptions to this rule. While you can increase the number of collectors to increase your
heat gain while the sun is shining, a shaded solar collector won’t collect any heat. Now you are torn.
You want to do the right thing for the environment by going with solar energy but it seems like you are
moving in the wrong direction if you have to cut down trees to get there. I can help with this a little. The
BP solar website can show you that the environmental benets of installing a system equals the impact
of planting 1 acre of trees. So unless you live in the forest, the environmental benet of adding a solar
hot water system is greater than the harm of removing a few trees. We removed 2 trees from our site
(1 pine and 1 walnut) and it broke my heart to do it, but I knew pollution-wise we would be better in the
end. An unexpected benet was that by removing those two trees, our yard and smaller trees in it have
ourished.
Chapter 3: Sizing a System
In this chapter we will only cover sizing of systems for domestic hot water. While these same principles
and systems work well for space heating, the bulk of initial applications lie in the hot water sector.
There are a couple of rules of thumb that are useful for sizing solar hot water systems. Granted,
these rules of thumb apply for the average person/families water usage. If you bathe once a month
and wash all of your dishes in the creek, they will provide more hot water than you need. If you have
teenagers who participate in sports and like to take multiple 30-minute hot showers per day, the sizing
will probably provide a smaller fraction of your hot water. Depending on your location, the size of the
system, and your usage patterns, you should expect a solar hot water system to provide between 40-
80% of your hot water needs. This is also a rule of thumb. Personally, we have turned off the back-up
elements in our hot water tank so that the sun is providing 100% of our hot water. This may lead to a
few showers that aren’t quite as hot as some would like, but the environmental and nancial benets
are worth it for us.
The Beckett SolarHot Advantage: Our systems are scalable. It is easy to add additional
collectors to the system. It’s just as easy to use a larger hot water tank or put two standard
tanks together in case you decide that you need additional hot water storage.